Awaiting reviewer response It's not necessarily the same as 'under review' and 'awaiting reviewer scores'. We have initiated a verification process for the scopes used in our app with the Google support team. Eventually, an editor will make a decision and you will get your paper back with comments from peer reviewers. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. If that was the case for your paper, then a subsequent change to "Awaiting reviewer invitation" would mean that the editor is sending your paper for an additional review. Evaluate reviewer comments and your response carefully . What should I do? It's been about 4 months since I submitted a manuscript to a journal, but the status remains “Awaiting Reviewer Selection”. However, today, it changed back to Awaiting Referee Scores. So, why has it returned to Designing and building a large, complex software system is a tremendous challenge. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. I have mentioned this while submitting the author response and also mailed to the editor in chief. The correct response is “waiting for your reply” because of the inserted preposition. Oct 2022, it passed all the steps of reviews. In the interests of impartiality, if an author-suggested reviewer is used then we will complement this with a review from a second referee chosen by the journal from the general referee pool. So I just wonder why it was returned to the AE again – notfunnyatall. Timeline Revision deadlines will vary between publishers. A copy of the reviewer list will be available. But my question is as below. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again (1) Awaiting Admin Processing: 这是稿件顺利投出后的第一个状态，此时稿件由期刊秘书处理，如果稿件有问题，那么秘书会直接拒掉；如果形式审查没问题，秘书会将稿件送主编（Editor-in-chief，EIC）进一步处理。Awaiting Admin Processing状态持续时间一般不会超过2-3个 submit their response and/or their review on their behalf using the steps in the Registering a Reviewer’s Response Registering a Reviewer’s Response section below. 1. The status on the manuscript central remained unchanged till mid-May. (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). " The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Make your case to a third party (the panel), who are moderating the reviews they have received and ultimately producing a Awaiting Reviewer Response 24-Apr-2023 Under Review 25-Apr-2023 Awaiting AE Recommendation 1-May-2023 Awaiting EIC Decision 03-May-2023 Major Revision 04-May-2023 A revision has been submitted 18-May-2023 Awaiting AE Recommendation 18-May-2023 Awaiting EIC Decision 20-May-2023 I submitted a manuscript to a scientific journal. At the reviewer level, we recorded the reviewer’s first, middle, and last names, salutation, institutional address, and affiliation (department, institution, city, country); response to the invitation (“unavailable,” “no response,” “late response,” “conflict of interest,” “decline,” “agreed,” “email problem”); dates of the invitation to review, response to the You will see little messages like ‘awaiting editorial approval’, ‘awaiting reviewer scores’, ‘awaiting editorial board comments’ and ‘decision pending’ as your article wends its way through this process. The most recent ones will appear in a colored box. May 12, 2020 We are still awaiting a response from Google. 4w次，点赞4次，收藏26次。Elsevier 投稿各种状态总结1. The dashboard has been changed from "Awaiting reviewer selection" into " Awaiting Reviewer Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. The reviewer sets time aside to read the paper RFIs Activity Center Use this activity center to log, review, and track requests for information (RFIs) electronically, and record the history of actions. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. Among one month, the status stays "Awaiting Referee Reports" without handling by editor. How long I should wait for the final verdict? Reviewer List. What can this mean? The platform is At the reviewer level, we recorded the reviewer’s first, middle, and last names, salutation, institutional address, and affiliation (department, institution, city, country); response to the invitation (“unavailable,” “no response,” “late response,” “conflict of interest,” “decline,” “agreed,” “email problem”); dates of the invitation to review, response to the "First look" is a stage in the ScholarOne Manuscripts (S1M) system used by many journals. A self-contained response letter makes it easier for the reviewer to understand exactly what you did without having to flip back and forth between your manuscript and the response. So, its status is "Awaiting Decision". “Awaiting” means “waiting for. The status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Reply" to "Awaiting Reviewer Scores", then stayed like that for a couple of weeks and now today the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". This will open a field where you can either type or paste your reply. After a while, yesterday the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation". A few days ago, the status changed from 'Awaiting reviewer response' to 'Awaiting reviewer scores. I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified reviewers are being formally invited to review your manuscript. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". A paper submitted on the 28th of Feb has been on 'awaiting reviewer selection' to date. In the next round the second reviewer was not satisfied with the paper, but In December 2020, I submitted a paper to Frontiers. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to Here's a breakdown of what this status might mean: Submission of Revised Version: You have submitted a revised version of your manuscript after receiving feedback from the initial review I submitted a paper six weeks ago, and it's been four weeks since the status has been Awaiting Reviewer Scores. A 6. Then I submitted the revised manuscript in 10 days. Use it to perform the following tasks in the current project: Record questions and files related to an RFI Forward RFIs for review Record a reviewer response to an RFI Respond to [] (3) Should I attach a response document for reviewers' comments? I found no exact place for a response document in the submission system. Now, this status has remained for 18 days. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. Response to Invitations. If you log into your Reviewer Center instead of replying to an email, you will see a notice that you have a new invitation. The latter is a clear term that Learn about the stages of peer review for your article submission to a BMJ journal. Understanding the Decision Process . However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. But there is still no response. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. As an expert reviewer you contribute to the integrity of research and the exacting standards of SLEEP. Abstract. The First look stage means that your manuscript, after an "Accept" decision is scrutinized to see if it adheres to journal standards (a. I am really confused, can I contact the journal to explain this or should I just wait? 3. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. How much time does it usually take to get the response for the mentioned status? Also, should I wait Meaning of change from Awaiting Reviewer Assignment to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. 2. Still the status is same. Reviewer I submitted a manuscript to BMJ Open about a month ago and have checked status every day. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again SUBMISSION The editor selects up to three reviewers and asks them to evaluate the manuscript against a set of criteria The editor receives the reviewers’ I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. Awaiting reviewers decision 5. Do not email to ask about My paper underwent a revision. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified reviewers are being formally invited to review your manuscript. The author does not know the identity of the reviewers, but the reviewers know the identity of the author. The status of the paper changed several times. a) Is it possible to be rejected at this point? Answer: The status ‘Awaiting Referee Selection’ typically means that the manuscript is awaiting peer review. What are the reasons behind this Then I need to compare the IDs. Patiently awaiting your response. ” (Here, the phrase might come off as sarcastic or passive-aggressive. Instructions for reviewers . After a week the status changed to “Under Review”. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Here is a possible interpretation: the paper might have received the comments of all of its reviewers. the status of “awaiting reviewer assignment” just last for less than one day, and on the same day, the status was changed to “awaiting reviewer scores”. How long should I normally wait for the editor’s response, and when should I send a reminder email? Also, if I send a reminder email, What does it mean if the status has been Awaiting Reviewer Scores for four weeks - and what should I do? What are the indicators of acceptance in highly trusted journals, and what does 'Awaiting reviewer scores' mean? Hope that helps. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. Log In/Register. There is no set time for this to take. So, please give me The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" means that your paper has cleared teh initial editorial screening and will be sent for peer review. When i have contacted the editorial office, they The reviewer’s comments, author responses and editorial decision letters are published alongside the final published article, in citable form. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. However, yesterday the status reverted back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". Awaiting Reviewer Scores. Awaiting author/peer reviewer confirmation: Query regarding revised manuscript, which has been received. What does this mean? Will it go for review? Incorrect: I am awaiting for your response. For example: Correct: I am awaiting your response. Forms Tracking. This change has occurred The status "Reviewers contacted" means that the editor has sent out review invitations to the requisite number of reviewers (usually 2 or 3). We value your expertise in the area and your opinion on the manuscript you review, including its quality, novelty, and importance. Mega Nav. Submitted to Journal当上传结束后，显示的状态是Submitted to Journal，这个状态是自然形成的无需处理。2. 5a/5ab: Awaiting My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. The amount of time you will be given to make your revisions will reflect the extent of changes required. The filter “overdue” now shows all articles with status message “a review is overdue”. We wish you all the best and hope for a positive response. e. My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to Awaiting AE Decision". See all 'how to' guides. Of course, you can use either of the following: Waiting for your response; Waiting for your reply all editor and reviewer comments. It covers tools and methodologies, languages, data structures, and algorithms. The status has been the same for a few days. If the e-mail does not come with embedded response links, you will need to reply via e-mail. 7. Registering a Reviewer’s Response When a reviewer receives an invitation to review, they will be able to accept the decision using links Thomus please ignore my recent response. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to "Awaiting reviewer scores" which appropriate hyperlink sends the response to the journal and updates the system with your response. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. , "Awaiting AE decision". Hello, for your information, I submitted my paper on the 28. The statuses I've seen are: Awaiting Reviewer Selection, Awaiting Third Opinion, Awaiting Screener Assignment, and Awaiting Second Opinion. Now it is almost 3 weeks. Each response will be indicated by poster and time stamp. The status is "Waiting for reviewer assignment" since 24-4-2017. Such things include, in roughly increasing order of vigorousness: A. It has been three weeks since. So, you should wait for the next decision. An initial assessment will be performed, and the Associate Editor may reject without 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。 主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。 美陶 要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。但 The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. The average review period of the target journal that I submitted is two weeks, and it usually takes about a month to get the first revision. Could these two cases be better distinguished in the title overview list? Thanks Sabrina I have submitted a manuscript to a pediatrics-related journal. Review is Conducted. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) publishes papers on all aspects of that challenge: specification, design, development and maintenance. What does it mean? Why would manuscript status change from "awaiting reviewer decisions" to "evaluation requests sent to reviewers"? Ask Question Asked 8 years, 9 months Review is pending 4. ) Personal Experience and Expertise. 等待审稿人返回评审意见阶段。如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会Decline（拒绝），编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。一般会有一个审稿限期，但这个时间长短取决于审稿人是否守时。该阶段需要耐心等待。 3. One reviewer have endorsed the publication, however, another reviewer showed "revoked" in the Frontier interactive review table. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. IOP is committed to publishing high-quality material in its journals and most journals have quite high rejection rates, typically above 50%. However, I submitted the paper at the end of May and the status is still “under review. ” It has been almost 2 months now. Effective Date: 6-June-2017 Document Version: 2. Information for IJRR Reviewers. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. TOSEM also reports on 文章浏览阅读2. 84 Recommendations; Mohd Shariq. g. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again "Awaiting reviewers reply" means that your manuscript has been sent out for review. This means the initial check on the manuscript is complete, which means that the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and/or the Associate Editor (AE) believe/s the manuscript fulfills basic journal criteria such as novelty of the research, quality of the writing, After revising and resubmit an article (the first peer review result was "minor revisions"), the status changed after 3 weeks to "Awaiting Decision". As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". The closest entries I found are cover letter and supporting document. If the items awaiting reviewer response do not have matching IDs (NO condition), I want an email to send and List A to update and item. Can you please explain what it is going on? I submitted a manuscript to a journal by SAGE. Publication Success. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. , conflicting opinions in those comments, has sent the paper to another reviewer. Answered by Editage Insights on 14 Oct, 2021 . If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Adding new comments Directly under the respective reply, you can click on 'Add Comment' to respond to a particular content. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. Software Support. There were contradictions between the two reviews but the editor made little effort to reconcile them. If possible, when declining, they might also suggest alternative reviewers. If deemed suitable, the Editor will select referees for your paper, based on their scientific interests and background. Now I want to submit my manuscript to another journal, but it would be a duplicate submission in this situation. These status changes indicate that the journal is working on getting your manuscript It is possible that the reviewer has made a mistake, but it is also possible that the reviewer was not able to understand your point because of a lack of clarity, or omission of crucial detail in your paper. ). Thank you very much for accepting to be a part of the IJRR peer review process! (To volunteer to be a reviewer, please contact directly an Associate Editor in the Editorial Board who is in your area of expertise. This is the stage that the editorial team will be striving to get your manuscript to as swiftly as possible. Waiting for Your Reply. My last status was ''awaiting AE recommendation," and now it has changed to ''awaiting ED decision'' does this means my paper is rejected or what? If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. View. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". I have submitted a manuscript to IOP journal. What happens when you receive the decision letter? After peer review, the editor will consider feedback from the reviewers and then make a decision about the article. Popular answers (1) Oluwadara Pelumi Omotayo. But the editor, for some reason, e. If all the reviewers accept the invitations, the peer review process will start and the status will change to "Under review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating Reviewer Misconduct and the authors’ response to reviewers to determine if all your concerns have been addressed and if you are satisfied with the updates. As the status has already changed quite quickly I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. procession一般3－4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。主编在选择审稿人，等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。一般要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。 • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make 我在scholarone manuscript系统上投了一篇文章，awaiting RE assignment 3天后变成 awaiting reviewers' response，然后又过了9天左右，变成了awaiting reviewer scores，现在已经10天了，按照字面理解awaiting reviewers' response应该就是已经送外审了吧， What was the response for your manuscript. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Academic Editing Services What does it mean for SAGE SSCI awaiting reviewer assignment after I The reviewer will evaluate your manuscript based on the changes you've made in response to the previous reviews and A month ago, I submitted my paper to the Emerald journal, which uses the ScholarOne manuscript system. Click the link to begin your review. For guidance, use the Author Response to Reviewers Template. Meaning of the "awaiting reviewer assignment" in journal status. Note: If the e-mail does not come with embedded response links, you will need to reply via I submitted a manuscript to Scientific Reports. We recognise that life as an academic is often tough and want to support you in your journey to becoming a reviewer, or if you’re an established reviewer to lighten the load with access to tools and resources that we hope you will find helpful. I received a mail that all required reviews have been completed and the editor’s decision is awaited. The day after the submission though, the two statuses of ‘Awaiting I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Hi. Potential reviewers consider the invitation against their own expertise, conflicts of interest and availability. Generally speaking, the status "Awaiting a reviewer reply" could mean either of two things: 1. Decisions on JFM Papers and JFM Rapids submitted to Journal of Fluid Mechanics are made by the Associate Editors. Under review/Awaiting reviewer scores. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. During this time, the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out This means that the Editor is looking for suitable reviewers for your article. Back To Top. Awaiting Editor Assignment：你的文章将被编辑分到相关主题，以方便联系相关审稿人。 4. The primary goal of IJRR is to serve the robotics community by selecting, enhancing and publishing the top scientific and Role of the Editor. I guess they are waiting for the right response from the reviewer. If you would like to use the phrase “I await your response” or “awaiting your response” those are both fine as well. If possible, attach a point-to-point reply to reviewers. We’ll be back in contact as soon as a decision is made". Instruction for authors) and that figures are of sufficient quality (resolution for bitmaps). Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? But in the journal i submitted to, under review means AE is examining the paper as the first stage, while "awaiting reviewer scores" means it's actually out for review. x the filter option is very good and helpful. If the items awaiting reviewer response have matching IDs with pending reviews, I want the workflow to stop (YES condition). SpaceX 星舰第七次试飞二级失联后解体，一级再度上演「筷子夹火箭」回收，还有哪些信息值得关注？ I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". In my professional experience, I’ve used “Patiently awaiting your response” in emails to show anticipation and respect. I submitted a manuscript in mid-January 2021. Responding along the lines of “see prior response to reviewer 2” forces the editor or reviewer to read back and forth and cross-reference different responses; it is easier if the authors just repeat the prior response and explain that they did so. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. what is the meaning of the status " awiting for reviewer responce meaning"? doe sit means that there is a reviewer who accepted to review or may be we just waitng responce ( to accept to review"??) what is the meaning of recieved responce (0/4)? PKP Community Forum Awaiting for reviewer responce meaning. After reading the decision letter and comments, take a day to reassess them calmly. Maybe a few days. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. These status changes indicate that the journal is working on getting your 我在scholarone manuscript系统上投了一篇文章，awaiting RE assignment 3天后变成awaiting reviewers' response，然后又过了9天左右，变成了awaiting reviewer scores，现在已经10天 Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. Hello! I have submitted my paper to a journal and it has been 1. Click on “View Submission” to view the paper. How to avoid a desk reject Choose the right journal Journal Recommender Get support with writing and formatting SAGE Author Services Carefully check the submissions guidelines on the journal’s homepage. We initiated contacts last week via other means like Twitter (thanks for your support and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? I submitted a research paper to a journal. " Does this It is probably on the editor's desk and asking for a response may not hasten the decision. That was actually referring to my SECOND paper (which I am still awaiting the outcome for). The status changed to awaiting reviewer selection, and then changed to awaiting reviewer scores. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". This change has occurred After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". I have submitted a manuscript to a journal that uses ScholarOne manuscript submission system. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. Click on “Take Action. Thus, the status also reflects "Awaiting Reviewer Scores". I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. Required review completed/Pending approval Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. ” However, you can say “awaiting” without the preposition. k. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? With electronic submission of manuscripts and reviews, J-BHI aims to minimize the time from submission to publication and make the review process as transparent as possible to the authors by allowing online status checks of the review progress. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. ' However, I'm wondering that [the] ED, who is in charge of the editing team, has assigned [this status], but the GE hasn't assigned yet. I submitted a paper to some journal. This change has occurred 2. As per my understanding, the status should be Awaiting EIC Decision. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ If reviewers from the previous round are not available (no response or decline to re-review), then it is the task of the editor to evaluate if the comments have been addressed satisfactorily. The article may have been single or double anonymously peer reviewed before publication. It is very important that you keep to your deadline, as your paper may be withdrawn if the journal does not receive a response from you. " In my opinion this total lack of response empowers you to take more vigorous steps to contact the editors of the journal. What does it mean? Have the reviewers started working on my manuscript yet? In this case, our advice to this author, which was passed via the RCP, was to wait for 6-8 weeks to hear back from the journal (based on the average time to first response stated on the journal’s website) and then to Journal of Fluid Mechanics uses a single-anonymous model of peer review. A positive response may be more likely if you tailor the invitation to the reviewer; If there is a specific reason why you are inviting them, then include a note on this toward the beginning of the invitation. ” Scroll down to see the results returned from Referee Locator* or to search for After a few days, the status changed to "Awaiting Review Scores". After several days, it became "1 reviewer(s) accepted". If you select the Agreed hyperlink, you will be sent an additional e-mail that contains a link to your reviewer center. Finally, the status now is awaiting final decision since a week. Find out what happens when your article is awaiting reviewer response and how long it takes to get a decision. Meaning of quick change from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Decision as explained in a linked article at the end of this response. The IEEE EMBS is also applying sanctions against authors who have plagiarized work or are discovered to Continue Reading Generally, the status changes to "Awaiting ED recommendations" once peer review for the paper is done and the reviewer comments have come in. After two and half months the status got changed from awaiting reviewer scores to awaiting recommendation. Furthermore, by making your response self-contained, you reduce the likelihood that the reviewer will read the full manuscript and find new things to complain about. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The reviewer who raised the particular question or concern never sees your response and the panel members may not be specialists in the same area. Resources for authors and journals In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. If your manuscript is at this stage, then enough experts have agreed to read and evaluate it and we just need to wait for the reviewers to return their comments so that a decision can be taken. You may also wish to comment on how well the authors addressed the concerns of the other previous reviewers as well, or if Hi, In 3. This will include reviewers who were selected, invited, assigned, invitation response records, and copies of the reviewer score sheets received. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Skip to main content Ask a Question. I checked the status now: Reviewer 1 has already finished review in the end of May, and reviewer 2 approved it in thanks a lot. 5 months since then. However, on the same day, the Negative Example: “You missed the last three meetings. Within less than two months it came for minor revision. My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. But this could be either the “response due date” or the “review due date”. At revision do It is not uncommon for several different reviewers to make the same criticism of a paper. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? I have contacted the editorial, and they have responded, "We’re awaiting the final reviewer's comments. I just submitted my third article the other day and now the status is "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Cite. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. On this page. I submitted my manuscript to a journal. My manuscript had earlier gone through English proofreading by a professional vendor. Commented Mar 14, 2022 at 2:51. I received a mail in mid-February that the paper has passed initial screening and is awaiting reviewer selection. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted my revised manuscript to a mathematical journal since 12-04-2017. Awaiting vs. They mean the same thing but take out the extra preposition that “waiting” requires. 5. Witheditor如果在投稿的时候没有要求选择编辑，就先到主编那，主编会分派给别的编 Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. All I was requested to make revisions for my manuscript's format. Is the right of review cancled because Via the Associate Editor Dashboard, click on the “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” queue. The contributor form will be I have send my research for possible publication; after 45 days the status changed from round one (a review is overdue) to round two (awaiting reviewer comments). It has now been three months since I submitted the revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Selection：这部分是编辑开始邀请审稿人，由于不是每个审稿人都有时间，因此存在拒绝后重新找，因此这段过程也比较花时间。 5. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. A few days ago, the status was "reviewers invited". Add additional templates. Really, I didn’t understand how the journal can jump to the the second round review stage without sending me any comments from the first round to make the suggested corrections? Editor here. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. Motivation: In the first round one reviewer provided thoughtful and useful comments, the review of another reviewer was written in a rather rude language, however, we addressed all the comments as well. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. If the previous editorial decision was B (minor revisions), only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. Reviews can be returned to the editor within a few days, or it may take a couple of weeks depending on the journal. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. This chapter reviews the journal submission and review process, starting with navigating manuscript submission sites and proceeding through editorial review, peer review, editorial decisions, revising and resubmitting manuscripts, developing reviewer response letters, finalizing manuscripts, and correcting publisher proofs. Upon submission, Editors will assess the general suitability of your paper for the journal. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. 4e: Awaiting publisher decision: Dove Editorial is discussing the final decision with the Editor-in-Chief. I thought I could expect to hear the Associated Editor's decision soon. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Now, after reviewer scores and after awaiting recommendation, the status shows " Awaiting Reviewer Scores" and " Awaiting Final Decision" together. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. Evaluation requests sent to reviewers The journal never informed me about the decision. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Does it mean your paper will go through another round of review? Not necessarily. The paper stayed in the "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" stage for around three months. I don't think it took long for them to get back to me last time when it changed to awaiting recommendation. This is a long period, what are your recommendations? NB: Follow up email sent twice in the previous week After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. It depends on whether the editor invites new reviewers. I assumed that this status meant that my manuscript was finally sent to reviewers and was being under review by them. The reviewer has accepted the invitation It means reviewers have been invited but have not responded to the invitation. They then accept or decline the invitation to review. After two months, it changed to “awaiting recommendation” status. ” So, it’s never correct to say “awaiting for. Is this common in scientific journals? I submitted others manuscripts to other journals and the review process was different. Academic Editing Services Editing and How long should I wait for a response from the journal? So, we have made some edits/assumptions. I also noticed that there has been a change in update time but the status remains "reviewer(s) accepted". Currently, we are still awaiting a response from Google. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. What the "awaiting reviewer scores" most plausibly means here is that the reviews are now due! 4 weeks is also the time I'd expect the AE to allot for the reviewers (from past experience), and so the timing is right for the status to change from "Under review" to "Awaiting reviewer scores" - so it just means some reviewers haven't yet submitted Article submitted后 1、awaiting admin. A review invitation has been sent out but the reviewer has not yet accepted it. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. mzf ulax rjrpii vzas xtkrgqp phcr aiehoeb drss nwcqwwt axbpr